21.06.2010 10:28
Compensation for procrastination of court proceedings or implementation of a court act A
set of laws pertaining to compensation for procrastination of court proceedings
or implementation of a court act came into effect on May 04, 2010, including:
- Federal Law of the Russian Federation No.68-FZ
“On compensation for infringement of the right to a court proceeding or to
enforcement of a court act within a reasonable timeframe” dated April 30,
2010 (hereinafter the “Law”; published in Rossiyskaya Gazeta dated June
04);
- Federal Law No.69-FZ of the Russian Federation
“On introducing amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian
Federation in connection with adoption of the Federal Law ‘On compensation
for infringement of the right to a court proceeding or to enforcement of a
court act within a reasonable timeframe’” dated April 30, 2010
(hereinafter the “Law on Amendments”);
published in Rossiyskaya Gazeta dated June
04, 2010);
- Federal Law No.3-FKZ of the Russian Federation
“On introducing amendments to Articles 24 and 26 of the Federal
Constitutional Law ‘On arbitration commercial courts of the Russian
Federation’ and Federal Constitutional Law ‘On military courts of the
Russian Federation’” dated April 30, 2010 (hereinafter the “Constitutional Law”; published in Rossiyskaya Gazeta dated June
04, 2010).
The
Law establishes general rules for awarding compensation for infringements of
rights to a court proceeding or to enforcement of a court act within reasonable
timeframes. Such compensation was enacted upon request of the European Court of
Human Rights for purposes of elaborating the Russian compensation mechanism
targeted at protecting the right to a court proceeding within a reasonable
timeframe as an alternative to addressing the European Court of Human Rights. The
need for creating such a mechanism was established back in 2008 in the
Resolution No.734-O-P of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.
Further on, this issue was likewise addressed in a Decree of the European Court
of Human Rights dated January 15, 2009 on the case of Burdov vs. Russia (No.2).
Pursuant
to the Law, in the event the rights to a court proceeding within a reasonable
timeframe or to the enforcement of a court act that provides for a disbursement
from the state budget within a reasonable timeframe are violated, Russian and
foreign citizens and Russian and foreign organizations who are parties or third
parties with independent claims in a court case, collectors, debtors, as well
as suspects, accused, defendants,
condemned, acquitted, victims, civil plaintiffs, and defendants in
criminal proceedings can apply to the court or to a commercial arbitration
court for a compensation award.
A
violation of the right to court proceedings within a reasonable timeframe, in
particular, is deemed to be a court trial term exceeding three years for courts
of general jurisdiction or commercial arbitration court and four years for
criminal cases (in the event of establishing a suspect or accused).
The
Law sets out in detail the procedure and timeframes for applying for
compensation. Compensation is to be awarded in monetary form in the amount
determined based on the claims of the applicant, circumstances of the case,
duration and significance of consequences of the violation for the applicant,
as well as with consideration of the reasonableness, justice and practice of
the European Court of Human Rights.
The
Law on Amendments introduces changes into several legal acts. Changes have been
introduced into the Administrative Procedural Code, Criminal Procedural Code
and Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, establishing the criteria
for a reasonable term of court proceedings and the term for enforcement of a
court act. When determining a reasonable term for a commercial arbitration
proceeding, some of the circumstances to be considered are the legal and
factual complexity of the case, conduct of the participants, sufficiency and
effectiveness of the court’s actions for timely examination of the case and the
general duration of the court process. A detailed procedure for examining cases
on awarding compensation has been established in the Administrative Procedural
Code and Civil Procedural Code.
Under
the amendments, an interested party has the right to address a commercial
arbitration court or a court of general jurisdiction with an application for
acceleration of the case. The application is to be reviewed by the chairman of
the commercial arbitration court within five days from the time the court
receives it. Upon results of the examination a motivated resolution is to be
issued, which may establish timeframes for holding a court hearing on the case
or other actions for expediting the case examination.
At
the same time the Law on Amendments increases from two to three months the
timeframes for commercial arbitration courts to examine cases on contesting
normative and non-normative legal acts, cases on collecting mandatory payments
and sanctions; from fifteen days to two months for cases on administrative
violations; and from ten days to two months for cases on contesting decisions
of administrative bodies.
It
should be noted that on June 25, 2010 the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial
Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation will examine a draft Information
Letter containing clarifications on complex and ambiguous situations
connected with the Law and the Law on Amendments entering into effect.
Additional
information
Should you need
more detailed information on issues covered in this publication or on our
services, please contact our Moscow office, Andrey Savin at asavin@cls.ru or by phone at
+7 (495) 970-1090; or Irina Onikienko in our St. Petersburg office at
ionikienko@cls.ru or by phone at +7
(812) 346-7990.
This
review covers only a portion of issues related to the topic. The purpose of
this review is to provide our clients and other interested parties with
information on changes in the legislation which may, to a certain extent,
affect their business or interests. This review is not a legal opinion and does
not substitute required legal consultations or opinions on certain issues. Download
this Alert in PDF Format |